test(rule_engine_metrics): add test 't_metrics'
This commit is contained in:
parent
a5a8aa3b6d
commit
88913a9144
|
@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ all() ->
|
|||
, {group, events}
|
||||
, {group, multi_actions}
|
||||
, {group, bugs}
|
||||
, {group, rule_metrics}
|
||||
].
|
||||
|
||||
suite() ->
|
||||
|
@ -125,6 +126,9 @@ groups() ->
|
|||
t_sqlparse_true_false,
|
||||
t_sqlparse_new_map
|
||||
]},
|
||||
{rule_metrics, [],
|
||||
[t_metrics
|
||||
]},
|
||||
{events, [],
|
||||
[t_events
|
||||
]},
|
||||
|
@ -1327,6 +1331,43 @@ t_sqlselect_3(_Config) ->
|
|||
emqtt:stop(Client),
|
||||
emqx_rule_registry:remove_rule(TopicRule).
|
||||
|
||||
t_metrics(_Config) ->
|
||||
ok = emqx_rule_engine:load_providers(),
|
||||
TopicRule = create_simple_repub_rule(
|
||||
<<"t2">>,
|
||||
"SELECT payload.msg as msg "
|
||||
"FROM \"t1\" "
|
||||
"WHERE msg= 'hello' "),
|
||||
#rule{id = RuleId} = TopicRule,
|
||||
?assertEqual(0, emqx_rule_metrics:get_rules_matched(RuleId)),
|
||||
?assertEqual(0, emqx_rule_metrics:get_rules_passed(RuleId)),
|
||||
?assertEqual(0, emqx_rule_metrics:get_rules_failed(RuleId)),
|
||||
?assertEqual(0, emqx_rule_metrics:get_rules_exception(RuleId)),
|
||||
?assertEqual(0, emqx_rule_metrics:get_rules_no_result(RuleId)),
|
||||
|
||||
{ok, Client} = emqtt:start_link([{username, <<"emqx">>}]),
|
||||
{ok, _} = emqtt:connect(Client),
|
||||
ct:sleep(200),
|
||||
|
||||
emqtt:publish(Client, <<"t1">>, <<"{\"msg\":\"hello\"}">>, 0),
|
||||
ct:sleep(200),
|
||||
?assertEqual(1, emqx_rule_metrics:get_rules_matched(RuleId)),
|
||||
?assertEqual(1, emqx_rule_metrics:get_rules_passed(RuleId)),
|
||||
?assertEqual(0, emqx_rule_metrics:get_rules_failed(RuleId)),
|
||||
?assertEqual(0, emqx_rule_metrics:get_rules_exception(RuleId)),
|
||||
?assertEqual(0, emqx_rule_metrics:get_rules_no_result(RuleId)),
|
||||
|
||||
emqtt:publish(Client, <<"t1">>, <<"{\"msg1\":\"hello\"}">>, 0),
|
||||
ct:sleep(200),
|
||||
?assertEqual(2, emqx_rule_metrics:get_rules_matched(RuleId)),
|
||||
?assertEqual(1, emqx_rule_metrics:get_rules_passed(RuleId)),
|
||||
?assertEqual(1, emqx_rule_metrics:get_rules_failed(RuleId)),
|
||||
?assertEqual(0, emqx_rule_metrics:get_rules_exception(RuleId)),
|
||||
?assertEqual(1, emqx_rule_metrics:get_rules_no_result(RuleId)),
|
||||
|
||||
emqtt:stop(Client),
|
||||
emqx_rule_registry:remove_rule(TopicRule).
|
||||
|
||||
t_sqlselect_multi_actoins_1(Config) ->
|
||||
%% We create 2 actions in the same rule:
|
||||
%% The first will fail and we need to make sure the
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -95,13 +95,14 @@ t_rule(_) ->
|
|||
ok = emqx_rule_metrics:inc(<<"rule:1">>, 'rules.passed'),
|
||||
ok = emqx_rule_metrics:inc(<<"rule:1">>, 'rules.exception'),
|
||||
ok = emqx_rule_metrics:inc(<<"rule:1">>, 'rules.no_result'),
|
||||
ok = emqx_rule_metrics:inc(<<"rule:1">>, 'rules.failed'),
|
||||
ok = emqx_rule_metrics:inc(<<"rule2">>, 'rules.matched'),
|
||||
ok = emqx_rule_metrics:inc(<<"rule2">>, 'rules.matched'),
|
||||
?assertEqual(1, emqx_rule_metrics:get(<<"rule:1">>, 'rules.matched')),
|
||||
?assertEqual(1, emqx_rule_metrics:get(<<"rule:1">>, 'rules.passed')),
|
||||
?assertEqual(1, emqx_rule_metrics:get(<<"rule:1">>, 'rules.exception')),
|
||||
?assertEqual(1, emqx_rule_metrics:get(<<"rule:1">>, 'rules.no_result')),
|
||||
?assertEqual(2, emqx_rule_metrics:get(<<"rule:1">>, 'rules.failed')),
|
||||
?assertEqual(1, emqx_rule_metrics:get(<<"rule:1">>, 'rules.failed')),
|
||||
?assertEqual(2, emqx_rule_metrics:get(<<"rule2">>, 'rules.matched')),
|
||||
?assertEqual(0, emqx_rule_metrics:get(<<"rule3">>, 'rules.matched')),
|
||||
?assertEqual(3, emqx_rule_metrics:get_overall('rules.matched')),
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue