fix(ds): make conditionals less confusing
This commit is contained in:
parent
14022aded1
commit
0c05b3f019
|
@ -113,14 +113,15 @@
|
|||
| {delete, message(_)}.
|
||||
|
||||
%% Precondition.
|
||||
%% Fails whole batch if the message in question does not match (`while'), or
|
||||
%% does match (`unless'). Here "match" means that it either just exists (when
|
||||
%% pattern is '_') or has exactly the same payload, rest of the message fields are
|
||||
%% irrelevant. Useful to construct batches with "compare-and-set" semantics.
|
||||
%% Fails whole batch if the storage already has the matching message (`if_exists'),
|
||||
%% or does not yet have (`unless_exists'). Here "matching" means that it either
|
||||
%% just exists (when pattern is '_') or has exactly the same payload, rest of the
|
||||
%% message fields are irrelevant.
|
||||
%% Useful to construct batches with "compare-and-set" semantics.
|
||||
%% Note: backends may not support this, but if they do only DBs with `atomic_batches'
|
||||
%% enabled are expected to support preconditions in batches.
|
||||
-type precondition() ::
|
||||
{while | unless, message(iodata() | '_')}.
|
||||
{if_exists | unless_exists, message(iodata() | '_')}.
|
||||
|
||||
-type rank_x() :: term().
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue